Comparing two film versions of Romeo and Juliet

For my media coursework I am dep trickure to comp are the first 8-9 legal proceeding of twain versions of Romeo and Juliet. The first is by Franco Zeffirelli shafted in 1968 and the stand by is by Baz Luhrmann assumeed in 1996. They both use Shakespeares dialect but they are truly differently presented. The Zeffirelli version do in 1968 is set in a traditional scene because it is in Verona in Italy in the 1400s as Shakespeare set it. The Luhrmann commentary however, is set in new-made times (the last 40 years) somewhere in the U.S.A. I lead be looking at the visual images, the sound effects, and the modal value of the movie. One difference of both takes is that the Zeffirelli starts with a walled urban meaning over which the sun rises. It then moves to the city and into the market in front of the church art object the Luhrmann starts sedately with a TV in a dark room. On the TV is a news giver who reads the news: this is the Prologue of Shakespeares play. In the Zeffirelli film, the line of assent between Montagues and Capuletes is quite courteous, in a mocking way, at the beginning but in the Luhrmann version, everyone is frantic, especially the Montague boys, but they in time manage to put a shouted sir! at the blockage of each sentence.

The fight in Zeffirelli starts in the market trance in the Luhrmann the fight is in the gas station. There are modern houses and buildings in the Luhrmann film while in the Zeffirelli film the houses are of the middle Ages. In the Zeffirelli film the regimen they collapse is the kind they would sweep remote in the middle Ages whereas in the Luhrmann they eat modern food like chips. People who made the Zeffirelli agree move hard to make... If you pauperism to get a full phase of the moon essay, raise it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper