Dulce Et Decorum Est Essay

World War matchless was a time of divisions, non only between countries but between the different people inwardly one country. In many western countries the propaganda convinced young workforce to enlist to delivering war as a great encounter and the Germans as an imminent enemy The Huns. But as news came venture from the Western Front and Gallipoli, there was a intellect that the war was not glorious, the dirtiness, the sheer loss of life was beginning to be revealed finished poems such as Dulce et Decorum Est.However, with enlistment numbers dropping, the see of a noble, adventurous war needed to be re support and this can be ensnare in Whos for the Game, by Jessie pope. In this poem, Pope, affirms messages of jingoism as righteous and justified. She describes England as up to her neck in a beseech and that the right course of action is to grip and cheat the job unassailable using sporting allusions to make the war seem like a gage. For example, this game is played , the enemy is tackled as a rugby histrion would attack an opponent, and the entire war is just a show.One could take a seat in the stand and be break of the fun or toe the banknote. This sporting imagery, suddenly removes the thought process of war as a bloody, dirty, nightmarish suffering and transforms it into an exciting prospect. It attacks the commentators sense of manliness, affirming Edwardian notions that men prove themselves under fervour in war and also the chivalric notion of helping your country, personified as a woman stuck in a fight and also the theme of leaving fellow spends behind by not joining in the fun.On the other hand, Dulce et Decorum Est, uses solidism and diabolical imagery to portray the war the way it is. The first line immediately strips the soldiers of all dignity, equate them to old beggars who had turnedbacks to the enemy trenches. They were bent double and cursing through sludge and drunk with fatigue. The image of defeat, is portrayed th rough the soldiers world deaf even to the hoots of gas shells dropping softly behind. These men no longer see any true value in living, their hellish nightmare of haunting flares, thick green light and the conjure up of the flummoxs sick of sin.Shows war to be an atrocity not fit for humanity. There is no sense of a red crashing game or any sense of fun. Suddenly, the reader wishes they did have a seat in the stand. Apart from the depiction of warfare, the image of a noble death or death in war is strange in these two poems. Whereas, Jessie Pope omits any mention of death or suffering, Owen goes into immensely graphic, borderline gratuitous detail of the gassing of a man. He describes the man floundring like a man in chevvy or lime who was dr birthing in a green sea.The informal word flung describes the way a corpse is disposed. The individual human has been minify to an object, a corpse that has no real value, and is a burden. Pope, creates an image of speck in war as hon ourable and respectable. The idea of returning back with a crutch as a heroic sentiment. Of the man who took a sluggard and survived. She makes it seem as though there is no real attempt of going to war, there is no graphic imagery and any mention of the bad aspects of war is referred to in opposites.It wont be a picnic but from this the reader cannot conjure the image of war as a nightmare, as a hell the way that Owen does with his description of the temporary removal face engaging the visual senses of the reader, the sound of blood come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs the notion obscene as cancer and one can almost discernment the vile incurable sores, bitter as cud on their own innocent tongues. This activation of four major sense immerses the reader in the almost unbelievable scene of war. Even the soldiers in there half(prenominal) trance sate, march asleep, unable to comprehend their situation.Thus, the audience of Jessie Popes poem is most likely the children ar dent for some dread(a) glory described in Dulce et Decorum est. Desperately glorious. Perhaps that is the best way to describe how Pope conceives war. Furthermore, the poems contrast with this idea of patriotism. The quote found on war memorials and that ends Dulce et Decorum est, is attacked in Owens poem whereas it is affirmed in Jessie Popes inspirational call to action and invocation. Wilfred Owen describes the idea of pro patria mori as an old lie. As untenable to anyone who has had any birth of real war.We must consider that Jessie Pope probably never visited the apparent motion line and never experience a man dying on her guttering, choking, drowning on his own fluids. The title of Owens poem is ironic, as the sum of the poem seeks to disprove this notion. If we examine what Jessie Pope uses to make her poem such an effective example of propaganda, of making the idea of pro patrai mori noble, we see the anaphoric repetition of the who question. Of engaging the reader dir ectly, of making the reader feel guilty for not helping their mother country.She uses ctive verbs such as tackle and grip to add to this idea of excitement which is absent in the soldiers poem. Which is absent in truth. In conclusion, we see the whereas Jessie Pope attempts to discombobulate the truth about the futility and atrocities of war, Owen, a soldier gives us a confrongtingly hardheaded portrayal of the death of just one man in a retreat on the western front. Whereas Jessie Pope affirms ideas of jingoism, Owen shows how the soldiers on the front line couldnt care less. Whereas Jessie Pope inherently affirms the idea of dying in war as manly and noble, Owen shows us how unceremoniously and graphic real deaths in war are.