In Praise of the F Word Essay

fit to, In Praise of the F Word, by Mary Sherry tens of thousands go forth calibrate high take aim with meaning slight diplomas. Those with meaningless diplomas are the ones whos been sacking along even though they dont truly conceive the materials taught to them. Sherry argues that our cultivational system is to point for cheating those students erupt of a turn aroundmly education however, an easy remedy is for t individuallyers to use the trump nib of tribulation. Sherry claims that out front students muckle concentrate, the teacher demand to retrieve their financial aid firstly.I confine with Sherry that its unfair to those student cheated by our educational system simply her trump twit of failure doesnt solve the fuss. Instead, it feels more analogous a affright to the student than a motivation. Her method is incompatible for in all in all students because all student are different and it takes a teachers involvement to understand, not a teachers threat . Sherry used blame the students lack of concentration to the class plainly preferably she now blames the failure to get the students attention.No librate what distraction are at hand for the student, the teacher sine qua nons to get the students attention first. Sherry states that there are many slipway to do this depending on the teaching method style but one confident(predicate) way is the trump card of failure. She points out an example of her son who was missing attention in class and then received the trump card of failure. It resulted in her son finishing the semester with an A. I feel like Sherrys argument is incomplete. She doesnt acknowledge that all students are different, and that some enter from a more rugged background than others.Different students bespeak to be treated differently, so one method will not manoeuver on all students. For example, there are students that plainly do not understand the material taught to them so instead they make up excuses. Te achers will see the students excuse as a lack of attention and fail that student but instead all that student needs is a bit of guidance. Sherrys method will not fiddle for students that are afraid to ask for attend. Furthermore, the threat will not help the student but give the doubt in their abilities. A animal for motivation turns into a tool for discouragement.Instead of facing the challenge top on with the help of the teacher, the students are left simply with the threat halo in their ears. Students that cant take the pressure eventually project out, students that can just keep to themselves and barely passing by. I reserve that Sherry brings up a good point In order for a student to succeed in tutor, they first need to be attentive. Teachers need to find way to get the students attention but Sherrys one all be all way will not help the teacher nor the students. Sherry implies that students perceive education as less important compared to their adult counterparts. no m atter what environments they come from students will not put school as a top priority on their list.Her argument was that for adults, even with complications in invigoration i. e. unemployment, drug, abusive relationship, still make an effort towards higher education. Sherry states that compared to the adults, students kind of be billingfree succession on cruise control through school. I wholeheartedly agree with Sherry that students would rather have a fun stress free school life instead of a prison, but I have a problem with her implications of a terrible environments.Sherry hints that environments does not affect a students involvement in school but i think shes severely inaccurate. Where a student come from, i. e. his lifes background, greatly affect what kind of person that student will turn out to be. For example, a student can come from a background that greatly values education at the same time, another student can come from a background that could care significantly les s astir(predicate) education. Not everyone is molded the same, there are students that are eager to learn, while there are also students that would refuse the help of a teacher.Sherry claims that the threat of flunking can be used as a positive teaching tool a show of confidence by the teacher and refer to the student. However, She also completely fails to specify why students fail in the first place. There are students who doesnt value education because of their unsupportive parents. Sherrys son might be an inaccurate example because not all students have an english teacher as a parent. My friend Hao is a perfect example. Hao and I were best friends in middle school and freshmen division high school.His parents are always working so hes exceedingly relaxed towards school. Everytime I hang out with him hes both playing video games or watching movies. Eventually the lack of care for school caught up with him and he was held back for another freshman year. We approximate to keep in touch but our friendship grew apart because we arent in the same grade anymore. Sometime we would go weeks without seeing each other and the intervals just got longer each time. The times I do see him, I can tell hes miserable.He dropped out without telling me and to this day I still wonder if I encouraged him alittle more about school, maybe he wouldve graduated with me. To my friend, Hao, school was just not important to him and even a threat of failure will not convince him otherwise. In his world, games were more important and school is just a nuisance. He was never taught the true value of an education by his parents. I know hes not alone and there are many students like him. Although their world might not be gaming, it could be something else like friends, drugs, intercourse, etc.Sherrys trump card of failure would of failed them, instead they need support not threats. While Sherry may claim that the success of the trump card of failure in the past. I would like to point o ut that things are forgotten for a reason. In this care the trump card of failure is deemed ineffective against the youths of today. Her method of teachers development threats against students for their attention will not help but damage. Everyone is unique and teachers need to deploy unique tactics to encourage students. A word of threat can only get so far, but the consequence greatly outweighs the worth.